It was a radical idea at its core, but entirely in character as pair Mark Zuckerberg, in a bid to see an optimistic future of writing where people converse with content creators through AI clones of the latter. This futuristic concept is said to have the potency of depolarizing the thrust of creative geniuses in the creative digital field by duplicating their accounts on different platforms.
If it is true that people tend to stay awake later at nights and have shortened sleep and wake up very early, it is made worse by the fact that content creators work not less than 20 hours a week to create new content. Thus, according to the CEO of Meta, Zuckerberg, AI could help to reduce this load. He told me of a reality where artists wade in to program these bots with their personalities and that of their business dealings such that they precede them in managing engagements with fans as replicas.
‘‘It is like a piece created by artists that is then opened to the public to touch and to be utilized in various ways,’’ Zuckerberg said in an interview recently. The concept has been that through these AI clones, creators were to be relieved of the daily dramatic interactions so as to work on the next piece.
Thus, the idea is far from being free from controversy. Critics claimed that such evolution would diminish the genuine of live performances that viewer expects to see. Additionally, Meta has had issues with AI bots themselves where the bots were caught spreading fake news and or making logical mistakes.
Where Meta is concerned it is launching its latest AI model Llama 3. 1, the debate intensifies. Is it possible to achieve an actual mimicry of the soft human hand, or is AI going to stay a tool with all possible problems? As such an audacious plan is enacted across the internet, the digital environment observes keenly, debating if the time of fake intelligence replicas has arrived or is too distant.